The well-ordering principle
July 9th, 2009 at 9:25 amThe well-ordering principle states:
The well-ordering principle: Any nonempty set of nonnegative integers has a smallest element.
DUH, you don’t say! - seems obvious, doesn’t it? This principle is, nevertheless, a very important and fundamental tool for proving other basic principles of number theory.
Consider, for instance, the Division Algorithm:
The Division Algorithm: If m and n are integers with n > 0, then there exist integers q and r, with 0 <= r < n, such that
.
Again, this is so basic that one may doubt whether it should even be proved. But the well-ordering principle allows us, in fact, to prove the division algorithm in a rigorous manner:
Let
. It is obvious that W contains nonnegative integers. Let
. By the well-ordering principle, V has a smallest element, which we’ll call r.
, so
for some q and r >= 0 (by the definition of sets W and V, correspondingly).
Now, what’s left to prove is that r < n. Let’s assume the opposite, namely that
. Rearranging:
. By the definition of V,
(since it has the form
for some integer t and is nonnegative). But recall that we called r the smallest element of V, and
, so we have a contradiction.
Therefore, we see that r < n. This completes the proof. Q.E.D.
Related posts:

July 9th, 2009 at 14:18
Have you read about the connection with the Axiom of Choice?
I find it mind-boggling.
July 9th, 2009 at 17:09
Ron, to be completely honest, I don’t think I have a good enough understanding of the philosophical foundations of mathematics to appreciate the “mind-boggling”-ness of this connection. Perhaps you can explain it to me some time.
July 9th, 2009 at 18:49
For starters, read the entry on Banach-Tarski Paradox.
July 15th, 2009 at 10:36
You might consider why ‘it is obvious’ that W contains nonnegative integers. In fact, proving this when m is negative requires a second application of the well-ordering principle!