Comments on: SICP - conclusion

By: Mike Sluyter

Mike Sluyter — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:27:19 +0000

You’ve inspired me to work through the SICP as well. Thanks!

By: Shannon -jj Behrens

Shannon -jj Behrens — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 00:55:54 +0000

I watched all the videos, and blogged about them 8 times: http://jjinux.blogspot.com/search/label/sicp

Suddenly, I feel so inadequate

By: eliben

eliben — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:28:30 +0000

raof01:
It all depends on your goals. What do you expect to learn ? Which tools do you think will be important for you in the future ?

IMHO it’s best to begin with SICP, anyway.

By: raof01

raof01 — Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:11:45 +0000

Hi, I’ve a question.
I’m going to read the dragon book, Introduction of algorithm, and SICP(in this order). According to your article, I think it’s better to start with SICP.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
——
My background: a programmer. Only learned (5 years ago) data structure (in C) and OS internals, 386 architecture. oh, and assembly of 386, because my major in college was civil engineering.

By: lukasjob

lukasjob — Thu, 05 Jun 2008 09:19:24 +0000

man you’re my hero!!! as someone already said …
great accomplishment I’m studying SICP too (currently at section 2.5) and come to see your blog from time to time
I’ve almost finished HTDP doing every single exercise this is a great book too.
luca

By: Geoff Knauth

Geoff Knauth — Tue, 22 Apr 2008 10:29:54 +0000

I’ll buy you dinner if you ever come through Williamsport PA, or if we meet elsewhere.

By: 3fen

3fen — Mon, 21 Apr 2008 00:30:14 +0000

Congratulations!
I’m doing these exercises too, and I hope I can complete them like you.

By: Binny V A

Binny V A — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 17:56:42 +0000

Great job. Some day I will follow your path. Hopefully someday soon.

By: Phillip Rhodes

Phillip Rhodes — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 02:53:36 +0000

Congrats! Sounds like quite the adventure.

By: Rory Winston

Rory Winston — Sat, 19 Apr 2008 21:48:28 +0000