<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SICP sections 3.1.2 - 3.1.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/09/27/sicp-sections-312-313/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/09/27/sicp-sections-312-313/</link>
	<description>Eli Bendersky's personal website</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eliben</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/09/27/sicp-sections-312-313/#comment-128239</link>
		<dc:creator>eliben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/09/27/sicp-sections-312-313/#comment-128239</guid>
		<description>I guess that if one reads the small print of the contract, you're right. But I think my solution is good enough, as it provides the required protection, and does so in a much more elegant manner than the solution to the original requirement leads to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess that if one reads the small print of the contract, you&#8217;re right. But I think my solution is good enough, as it provides the required protection, and does so in a much more elegant manner than the solution to the original requirement leads to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/09/27/sicp-sections-312-313/#comment-127858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/09/27/sicp-sections-312-313/#comment-127858</guid>
		<description>I think you are missing an requirement here for Exercise 3.7: "Define a procedure make-joint that accomplishes this. Make-joint should take three arguments. The first is a password-protected account. The second argument must match the password with which the account was defined in order for the make-joint operation to proceed."

The questions asks to signal an indication that the make-joint was not successful due to an incorrect acc-pass, yours only fail when the joint account try to withdraw money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are missing an requirement here for Exercise 3.7: &#8220;Define a procedure make-joint that accomplishes this. Make-joint should take three arguments. The first is a password-protected account. The second argument must match the password with which the account was defined in order for the make-joint operation to proceed.&#8221;</p>
<p>The questions asks to signal an indication that the make-joint was not successful due to an incorrect acc-pass, yours only fail when the joint account try to withdraw money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
