<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Educational path</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/</link>
	<description>Eli Bendersky's personal website</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Austin King</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/#comment-63392</link>
		<dc:creator>Austin King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/#comment-63392</guid>
		<description>Why not use PLT Scheme for SICP graphics problems? I am starting a SICP study group in Seattle and am keen to know if you are choosing to do SICP in CL or if PLT has some issues.
http://www.plt-scheme.org/

For CL, I like ltk. I was able to use it on Mac, Linux, and Win. The underlying Tcl/TK is free, stable, and well documented. Pick up a Perl/Tk book as well as the LTK pdf and you're set.
http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not use PLT Scheme for SICP graphics problems? I am starting a SICP study group in Seattle and am keen to know if you are choosing to do SICP in CL or if PLT has some issues.<br />
<a href="http://www.plt-scheme.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.plt-scheme.org/</a></p>
<p>For CL, I like ltk. I was able to use it on Mac, Linux, and Win. The underlying Tcl/TK is free, stable, and well documented. Pick up a Perl/Tk book as well as the LTK pdf and you&#8217;re set.<br />
<a href="http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.peter-herth.de/ltk/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eliben</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/#comment-61262</link>
		<dc:creator>eliben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2007 05:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/#comment-61262</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip. 

Practical Common Lisp also goes over packages, and gives a good drill on pathnames. I think I'll take this direction first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip. </p>
<p>Practical Common Lisp also goes over packages, and gives a good drill on pathnames. I think I&#8217;ll take this direction first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lispy</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/#comment-61203</link>
		<dc:creator>lispy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 18:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2007/07/27/educational-path/#comment-61203</guid>
		<description>Stuart Shapiro's book forces you to get fluent with packages fairly quickly.  Exercise after exercise requires you to continually alter and reuse packages from almost the very beginning.

http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/WWW/faculty/shapiro/Commonlisp/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart Shapiro&#8217;s book forces you to get fluent with packages fairly quickly.  Exercise after exercise requires you to continually alter and reuse packages from almost the very beginning.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/WWW/faculty/shapiro/Commonlisp/" rel="nofollow">http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/pub/WWW/faculty/shapiro/Commonlisp/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
