<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting scientific facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/16/interesting-scientific-facts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/16/interesting-scientific-facts/</link>
	<description>Eli Bendersky's personal website</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 14:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: eliben</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/16/interesting-scientific-facts/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>eliben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 05:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/16/interesting-scientific-facts/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Anton, you're right their answer for the 5th question is indeed very limping. Here is a better explanation: http://www.plover.com/blog/physics/questions.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anton, you&#8217;re right their answer for the 5th question is indeed very limping. Here is a better explanation: <a href="http://www.plover.com/blog/physics/questions.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.plover.com/blog/physics/questions.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anton</title>
		<link>http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/16/interesting-scientific-facts/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Anton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2006 23:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eli.thegreenplace.net/2006/04/16/interesting-scientific-facts/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Well, actually they leave the fifth question unanswered. The answer given is a definition, not an explanation, and hence, an example of circular reasoning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, actually they leave the fifth question unanswered. The answer given is a definition, not an explanation, and hence, an example of circular reasoning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
